🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to pass a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any action must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation established by the family of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to follow the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are less and less prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.